System
Atlas
Constructs/Process

Supplied or external workforce → native worker app → time capture → worker earnings and payout

Workflows that drive an outcome from step to step. Process steps that hand work to each other.

Companies
18
Of the industry
28%
The pattern
What every instance has, in order
PeopleSupplied orexternal workforceSoftwareNative worker appProcessTime captureProcessWorker earningsand payoutSolid arrows: a flow seen between the two at instance companies. Dashed: order only.
Invariant
Shared by at least 90%
  • Supplied or external workforce100%
  • Native worker app100%
  • Time capture100%
  • Worker earnings and payout100%
Variant
Where they differ
Included for Members
  • Scheduling13 · 72%
  • Work-time review and approval12 · 67%
  • Client web portal10 · 56%
  • Approver interface9 · 50%
  • Worker onboarding9 · 50%
  • Pay and bill terms9 · 50%
  • Public audience routing8 · 44%
  • Matching and selection8 · 44%
  • Payroll7 · 39%
  • Sites and projects7 · 39%
  • Credentials and eligibility7 · 39%
  • Operational messaging7 · 39%
  • Exceptions and recovery7 · 39%
  • Worker profile6 · 33%
  • Client accounts6 · 33%
  • Staffing demand intake6 · 33%
  • Client billing and invoices6 · 33%
  • Client contacts and responsibilities5 · 28%
  • Work evidence beyond hours5 · 28%
  • Client own-workforce management4 · 22%
  • Multi-location operations4 · 22%
  • External system handoffs4 · 22%
  • Returning worker pools4 · 22%
Couplings
What comes together

Variant pairs seen together at least 1.5 times as often as chance.

Included for Members
  • Client contacts and responsibilities + Work evidence beyond hours×3.6
  • Client accounts + Client contacts and responsibilities×3.0
  • Client accounts + Work evidence beyond hours×3.0
  • Worker profile + Client contacts and responsibilities×3.0
  • Worker profile + Work evidence beyond hours×3.0
  • Client accounts + Multi-location operations×3.0
  • Sites and projects + Client accounts×2.6
  • Sites and projects + Client contacts and responsibilities×2.6
  • Sites and projects + Work evidence beyond hours×2.6
  • Sites and projects + Multi-location operations×2.6
  • Client accounts + Staffing demand intake×2.5
  • Worker profile + Client accounts×2.5
Entropy
Where it runs rough

Operating-reality findings at instance companies: workarounds, manual hand-offs, bottlenecks.

  • Credentials and eligibility1 finding
    Dependency 1 · at 1 company
  • Pay and bill terms1 finding
    Tacit rule 1 · at 1 company
Seen across
Where it holds
Industries
  • Staffing100%
Size
  • 11-50 people6%
Region
  • US78%
  • Canada / US6%
  • United States6%
  • United States (Texas, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, Arizona, Colorado)6%
  • US / UK6%
Instances
The 18 companies it was seen at
Included for Members