The functions every households as employers of domestic personnel company runs on. It has no schema of its own: companies here are mapped on the Universal schema, and what it does not cover is recorded as gaps.
© 2026 System Atlas · Built by MIOSA
Free to map your own company · Members $300 a yearHow automatable each primitive is, estimated from the 20,605 organizations mapped in public on the Universal schema, which this industry inherits: the share of those with the primitive that run it on software. Estimate from public data: the share of mapped organizations that run this on software. Not a recommendation.
| Primitive | Layer | Automation | Peers on software | Software parts named most |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Accounting and close Money: getting paid and paying | Software | HighLayer only | 1 of 20,605 mapped; too few to read | CFO Kelly Battles (1) |
Core system of record Systems: tools and data | Software | HighEstimate | 23 of 23 on software | AT Protocol (1), Backend migration to WordPress (on hold) (1), Cloud-hosted platform on AWS (1) |
Communication tools Systems: tools and data | Software | HighEstimate | 9 of 9 on software | Clubs (1), Community chats (1), Direct messages (1) |
Integrations Systems: tools and data | Software | HighEstimate | 15 of 15 on software | ActivityPub federation (1), Amazon Payments (1), Bot API and Mini Apps (1) |
The rule, the same for every industry: with 5 or more organizations having the primitive, 50% or more of them on software is high, 20% or more medium, below that low. With fewer, the level rests on the primitive's layer alone and says "Layer only". Software parts are counted once per organization; a detected technology is named by its product. See the blueprint for which organizations run each.
Focused research on the organizations with the fewest mapped parts in households as employers of domestic personnel; what it finds is public for everyone.