Native worker app → time capture → worker earnings and payout
Workflows that drive an outcome from step to step. Mostly process steps.
Within one industryHolds in Staffing. Counted from public, sourced parts only; each organization below links to the parts it was counted on.
- Organizations running it
- 25
- Of their industry
- 0%
The pattern
What every instance has, in order
- SoftwareNative worker appin 96% of instancesthen
- ProcessTime capturein 100% of instancesthen
- ProcessWorker earnings and payoutin 100% of instances
Coloured arrows: a flow of that type seen between the two at instance organizations. Grey arrows: order only.
Structure
Element
Share of instances
Companies
Worker profile
44%
11
Client accounts
24%
6
Returning worker pools
24%
6
Variant · where they differ
Member
Variants, couplings and instances
Every level, number, source and dimension: Member, $300 a year.
Couplings · what comes together
Member
Variants, couplings and instances
Every level, number, source and dimension: Member, $300 a year.
Entropy
Where it runs rough
Operating-reality findings at instance companies: workarounds, manual hand-offs, bottlenecks.
- Credentials and eligibility1 findingDependency 1 · at 1 company
- Staffing demand intake1 findingInformal channel 1 · at 1 company
- Matching and selection1 findingBottleneck 1 · at 1 company
- Pay and bill terms1 findingTacit rule 1 · at 1 company
- Returning worker pools1 findingTacit rule 1 · at 1 company
- Work-time review and approval1 findingDependency 1 · at 1 company
Seen across
Where it holds
Industries
- Staffing100%
Size
- 11-50 people4%
Region
- United States72%
- Netherlands8%
- Canada / United States4%
- Germany4%
- United States (Texas, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, Arizona, Colorado)4%
- United States / United Kingdom4%
Instances
The 25 companies it was seen at
Member
Variants, couplings and instances
Every level, number, source and dimension: Member, $300 a year.