Organizations like San Manuel Band of Mission Indians

Every organization in the registry ranked by its fit to San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (Government agency, Indigenous and tribal governments, United States), from 0 to 100%: how close it is in what it does, its industry, the distinctive parts both public maps hold, and size and region. Change the weights to rank by what matters to you; the link keeps them.

Ranked by fit

1 of 1

Related60%+

60%

Little River Band of Ottawa Indians

Government agency · Indigenous and tribal governments · United States

Same sector · 1 distinctive shared part · Same country

Why 60%

Component	Match	Weight	Adds
What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most.	n/a	—	—
IndustrySame sector	98%	75%	+73.3
Shared parts1 distinctive part on both public maps.	62%	13%	+7.8
Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both.	100%	13%	+12.5
Fit			60%

Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.

Weights

Find by name or placeWhat it does60%How close what they say they do reads (their own descriptions, encyclopedia and public records, products), against how close an ordinary organization reads. Unknown when either has no description of its own.Industry30%Filed in the same segment, industry or sector, or of the same kind and industry on Wikidata. Crowded categories count for less.Shared parts5%Distinctive parts both public maps hold. Parts nearly every map holds count for nothing.Size & region5%Same country, a similar head-count band and the same business model, where both are known.

Weights are re-scaled to 100%. A component not known for both is left out and the rest re-weighted for that organization. When either has no description of its own, the fit stays at 60% or less.

What the % means

With the default weights, calibrated on a judged set of organizations across sectors: at 85% and above nearly every match is a direct peer, 70 to 85 close, 60 to 70 related. A profile lists 65% and above; this ranking goes down to 40%.

It is not a quality rating. Only public registry data counts: public descriptions and records, the atlas taxonomy, Wikidata, and open parts of public maps. Never a workspace's private data.