Every organization in the registry ranked by its fit to Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund Ok City Community Foundation Inc (Nonprofit, Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion, United States), from 0 to 100%: how close it is in what it does, its industry, the distinctive parts both public maps hold, and size and region. Change the weights to rank by what matters to you; the link keeps them.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Anabaptist Foundation under NTEE T12 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Apella Health Management Inc under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Bradley Impact Fund Inc under NTEE T12 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Car Donation Foundation under NTEE T12 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Coefficient Giving Advisors Inc under NTEE T99 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana Inc under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Deitch Family Charitable Support Trust under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Donors Trust Inc under NTEE T99 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Forward America Inc under NTEE T12 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Fund for Charitable Giving under NTEE T99 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Gift Clearing Trust under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Give Back Foundation under NTEE T12 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Gordon Christian Trust under NTEE T90 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Greater Horizons under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Hollis Foundation under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Hopewell Fund under NTEE T12 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Impact Investing Charitable Trust under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies J A & Leta M Chapman Charitable Tr under NTEE T90 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jack Joseph and Morton Mandel Supporting Foundation under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation under NTEE T90 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Lettie Pate Evans Foundation Inc Trustee of the Restricted Fund Uw under NTEE T90 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation Inc under NTEE T90 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Loma Linda - Inland Empire Consortium for Healthcare Educatio under NTEE T99 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Mcf Gift Fund Inc under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Methodist Primary Care Group under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Msi US under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Nacarato Family Trust under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Omaha Home for Boys Foundation Inc under NTEE T12 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Pledgeling Foundation under NTEE T12 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc under NTEE T12 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Robert R Mccormick Foundation under NTEE T99 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Rockefeller Family Fund Inc under NTEE T90 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies San Angelo Area Foundation under NTEE T99 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Signatry Charitable Trust under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies St Johns Community Health under NTEE T99 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Suzanne and Walter Scott Foundation under NTEE T90 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Taylor Family Farms Foundation Inc under NTEE T99 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The Blackbaud Giving Fund under NTEE T12 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The James Family Charitable Trust under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The Skoll Fund under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The US Charitable Gift Trust under NTEE T12 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The Walton Family Charitable Support Foundation Inc under NTEE T90 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Tigers Unlimited Foundation under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Unlikely Collaborators Inc under NTEE T99 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Unlikely Giving Inc under NTEE T12 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Wyatt Family Foundation under NTEE T11 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 81% | 75% | +60.9 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Assets Under Movement under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Boston Foundation Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Columbia Lutheran Charities under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Columbus Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Community Foundation of Greater Flint under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Dechomai Asset Trust under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Dechomai Foundation Inc under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Marin Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
Investment firm founded by Pierre and Pamela Omidyar
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesKirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund Ok City Community Foundation Inc has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Pew Charitable Trusts under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The Seattle Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Tides Network under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies We Are Sharing Hope Sc under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same sector · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame sector | 55% | 75% | +41.5 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 54% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
© 2026 System Atlas · Built by MIOSA
Free to map your own company · Members $300 a year