Every organization in the registry ranked by its fit to Jewish Federation of Cleveland (Nonprofit, Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion, United States), from 0 to 100%: how close it is in what it does, its industry, the distinctive parts both public maps hold, and size and region. Change the weights to rank by what matters to you; the link keeps them.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies American Gift Fund under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Anne Ray Foundation under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Arizona Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Arkansas Community Foundation Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Bridges Philanthropic Fund under NTEE T50 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Charitable Assets Tr under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Christian Community Foundation of Memphis and the Mid-South Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Community Foundation of New Jersey under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Crown Family Foundation under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Daffy Charitable Fund under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Dayton Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Denver Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Fund for the City of New York Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Giveclear Foundation under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Greater Cincinnati Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Greater Good Charities under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Greater Houston Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Greater Miami Jewish Federation under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Greater Washington Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Hawaii Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Impact Investing Charitable Foundation Inc under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish Community Fdn of the Jewish Federation Council of Greater La under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest Nj under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Maine Community Foundation Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Minneapolis Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies National Christian Charitable Foundation Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies New Hampshire Charitable Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies New Partners Inc under NTEE T50 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies North Carolina Community Foundation Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Omaha Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Orange County Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Oregon Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Rf Catalytic Capital Inc under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Robin Hood Foundation under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Santa Barbara Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies St Louis Community Foundation Incorporated under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The Community Fdn of Middle Tn Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The Dallas Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The Golden L E A F Long-Term Economic Advancement Foundation in under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The Miami Foundation Inc under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The Pittsburgh Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The Rhode Island Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The San Diego Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies United States Energy Foundation under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies United Way of Central Alabama Inc under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies United Way of Greater Houston under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies University of Cincinnati Foundation under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Vermont Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesNeither has a description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 82% | 75% | +61.7 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
© 2026 System Atlas · Built by MIOSA
Free to map your own company · Members $300 a year