Every organization in the registry ranked by its fit to International Center for Responsible Gaming (Nonprofit, Grant-making foundations, United States), from 0 to 100%: how close it is in what it does, its industry, the distinctive parts both public maps hold, and size and region. Change the weights to rank by what matters to you; the link keeps them.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
We are commited to engaging more with the communities we fun, advancing a new vision of justice and investing in criminal justice & youth justice reforms.
Close in what it does · Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesHow close what it says it does reads to International Center for Responsible Gaming's, against an ordinary organization. | 61% | 60% | +36.6 |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 30% | +24.2 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 5% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 5% | +5.0 |
| Fit | 66% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies The Ahmanson Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Aidan Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Albert and Margaret Alkek Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Alphawood Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Bernice E Holland Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Bruner Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Calvert Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Calvert K Collins Family Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Charityvest Inc under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Charityvision International Inc under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Charles H Hood Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Charter Fund Inc under NTEE T21 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Chase Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Chrest Foundation Inc under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies The Cullen Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Dietrich Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Distribution Cooperative Inc under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Esther B Kahn Charitable Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Ferree Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Fiduciary Charitable Foundation under NTEE T21 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Henry Luce Foundation Inc under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Heritage Fund Inc under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Herzog Foundation Resource Management under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies The Inflammation Research Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies J Howard Pew Freedom Tr under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies J E and L E Mabee Foundation Inc under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies James B and Lois R Archer Charitable Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Japan Icu Foundation Inc under NTEE T21 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Jeremy and Hannelore Grantham Environmental Trust under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Lesea Global Feed the Hungry Inc under NTEE T23 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Margaret Clark Morgan Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Margot and Tom Pritzker Science Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Marine Toys for Tots Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies The Mary Kay Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Mcknight Brain Research Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies New England Biolabs Foundation Inc under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies One Tree Planted Inc under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Osteopathic Heritage Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Pert Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Pine Street Foundation Inc under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Plough Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Prostate Cancer Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Raleigh Rescue Mission Foundation Inc under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Raymond J and Mary C Reisert Foundation Inc under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Rollie R Kelley Family Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies S Mark Taper Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Siemer Family Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Simha Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Southeast Land Trust of New Hampshire under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Sparkplug Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies T Boone Pickens Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies The Grady Health Foundation Inc under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies The Grateful Lives Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies The United Methodist Retirement Homes Inc under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies Wilburforce Foundation under NTEE T20 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Grant-making foundations · United States
The IRS classifies William K Warren Foundation under NTEE T22 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 81% | 75% | +60.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
© 2026 System Atlas · Built by MIOSA
Free to map your own company · Members $300 a year