Every organization in the registry ranked by its fit to Colorado Springs Health Foundation (Nonprofit, Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion, United States), from 0 to 100%: how close it is in what it does, its industry, the distinctive parts both public maps hold, and size and region. Change the weights to rank by what matters to you; the link keeps them.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
When you want to conquer cancer, prevent heart disease, fix the unfixable and help a person to heal, turn to the CoxHealth Foundation. Your health is our #1 priority.
Close in what it does · Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesHow close what it says it does reads to Colorado Springs Health Foundation's, against an ordinary organization. | 62% | 60% | +37.3 |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 30% | +23.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 5% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 5% | +5.0 |
| Fit | 66% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference.
Healthcare system · General hospitals · United States
The Colorado Health Foundation is a private foundation focused on health. The organization's partners include nonprofits, health care leaders, policymakers, educators and the private sector.
Very close in what it does · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesHow close what it says it does reads to Colorado Springs Health Foundation's, against an ordinary organization. | 100% | 60% | +60.0 |
| IndustryFiled apart in the atlas, no shared Wikidata kind. | 0% | 30% | +0.0 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 5% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 5% | +5.0 |
| Fit | 65% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference.
Healthcare system · Hospitals · United States
Hospital in Colorado, United States
Very close in what it does · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesHow close what it says it does reads to Colorado Springs Health Foundation's, against an ordinary organization. | 100% | 60% | +60.0 |
| IndustryFiled apart in the atlas, no shared Wikidata kind. | 0% | 30% | +0.0 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 5% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 5% | +5.0 |
| Fit | 65% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference.
Healthcare system · General hospitals · United States
Healthcare organization in Grass Valley, United States
Very close in what it does · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesHow close what it says it does reads to Colorado Springs Health Foundation's, against an ordinary organization. | 100% | 60% | +60.0 |
| IndustryFiled apart in the atlas, no shared Wikidata kind. | 0% | 30% | +0.0 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 5% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 5% | +5.0 |
| Fit | 65% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference.
Healthcare system · Hospitals · United States
As Colorado’s first licensed acute rehabilitation hospital, we are the region’s premier facility for a wide range of physical and cognitive issues.
Very close in what it does · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesHow close what it says it does reads to Colorado Springs Health Foundation's, against an ordinary organization. | 100% | 60% | +59.7 |
| IndustryFiled apart in the atlas, no shared Wikidata kind. | 0% | 30% | +0.0 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 5% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 5% | +5.0 |
| Fit | 65% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference.
Educational institution · Tertiary education · United States
Public university system in Colorado, United States
Very close in what it does · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesHow close what it says it does reads to Colorado Springs Health Foundation's, against an ordinary organization. | 99% | 60% | +59.7 |
| IndustryFiled apart in the atlas, no shared Wikidata kind. | 0% | 30% | +0.0 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 5% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 5% | +5.0 |
| Fit | 65% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
Established in 1976, NDCF is a public, nonprofit corporation that manages more than $190 million in assets in over 1,000 charitable funds to improve the lives of North Dakota citizens and their communities. It is where donors and nonprofits meet to build better tomorrows.
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesHow close what it says it does reads to Colorado Springs Health Foundation's, against an ordinary organization. | 60% | 60% | +35.8 |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 30% | +23.4 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 5% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 5% | +5.0 |
| Fit | 64% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference.
Healthcare system · General hospitals · United States
Hospital in Colorado, United States
Very close in what it does · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesHow close what it says it does reads to Colorado Springs Health Foundation's, against an ordinary organization. | 96% | 60% | +57.8 |
| IndustryFiled apart in the atlas, no shared Wikidata kind. | 0% | 30% | +0.0 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 5% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 5% | +5.0 |
| Fit | 63% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference.
Company · Health care & social assistance
Boulder Community Health (BCH) is a nonprofit health system located in Boulder, Colorado.
Very close in what it does
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesHow close what it says it does reads to Colorado Springs Health Foundation's, against an ordinary organization. | 97% | 63% | +61.3 |
| IndustryFiled apart in the atlas, no shared Wikidata kind. | 0% | 32% | +0.0 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 5% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionNeither size, country nor business model known for both: left out. | n/a | — | — |
| Fit | 61% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference.
Healthcare system · Health systems and hospital networks · United States
Healthcare system in Colorado, United States
Very close in what it does · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesHow close what it says it does reads to Colorado Springs Health Foundation's, against an ordinary organization. | 94% | 60% | +56.2 |
| IndustryFiled apart in the atlas, no shared Wikidata kind. | 0% | 30% | +0.0 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 5% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 5% | +5.0 |
| Fit | 61% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference.
Healthcare system · General hospitals · United States
Nonprofit organization from South Dakota
Very close in what it does · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesHow close what it says it does reads to Colorado Springs Health Foundation's, against an ordinary organization. | 93% | 60% | +55.6 |
| IndustryFiled apart in the atlas, no shared Wikidata kind. | 0% | 30% | +0.0 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 5% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 5% | +5.0 |
| Fit | 61% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Arizona Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Bainbridge Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Central Louisiana Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Cfm Foundation under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Charitable Assets Tr under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Chattanooga Chamber Foundation under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Community Foundation of Broward Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Community Foundation of New Jersey under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Community Giving Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Crown Family Foundation under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Daffy Charitable Fund under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Denver Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Federation of Jewish Communities of the C I S Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Foundation for Metrowest Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Fund for the City of New York Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Giveclear Foundation under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Givewell Community Foundation Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Greater Cincinnati Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Greater Houston Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish Community Federation of Greater Rochester Ny Inc under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Manatee Community Foundation Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Mccourt Foundation Inc under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Minneapolis Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Mountain Bizcapital Inc under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies National Charitable Endowment Inc under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies National Christian Charitable Foundation Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies New Hampshire Charitable Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies New Partners Inc under NTEE T50 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Orcas Island Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Oregon Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Porter County Government Charitable Nonprofit Foundation Inc under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Skillsource Group Inc under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Stifel Charitable Inc under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The Community Fdn of Middle Tn Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies The San Diego Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies United States Energy Foundation under NTEE T30 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies United Way of Greater Houston under NTEE T70 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Vermont Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Washington County Community Foundation Inc under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
Nonprofit · Other philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion · United States
The IRS classifies Yakima Valley Community Foundation under NTEE T31 (major group T, Philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking foundations).
Same industry · Same country
| Component | Match | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it doesIt has no description of its own yet: left out, and the fit held to 60% at most. | n/a | — | — |
| IndustrySame industry | 78% | 75% | +58.6 |
| Shared partsNo distinctive part in common. | 0% | 13% | +0.0 |
| Size & regionCountry same · size not known for both · model not known for both. | 100% | 13% | +12.5 |
| Fit | 60% | ||
Fit = Σ weight × match over the components known for both, the weights re-scaled to 100%. Unknown is left out, never counted as a difference. Without a description of its own on both sides, nothing is claimed about what it does: the fit is held to 60% at most.
© 2026 System Atlas · Built by MIOSA
Free to map your own company · Members $300 a year